Message Board


web stats

Sunday, November 15, 2009

CAIR's statement condemning the violence at Ft. Hood


It's not often I agree with CAIR.... they too frequently take the apologist route of blaming the media for the "image problem" Muslims have rather than confront some of the very real reasons Americans and other non-Muslims are a little leery of Islam... especially the Muslims who would blur the precious lines of separation between Church and State we hold so dear.


Pasting text of the linked article below.

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 11/5/09) - A prominent national Muslim civil rights and advocacy group tonight condemned an attack on Fort Hood military base in Texas that left at least 12 people dead.

In a statement, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said:

“We condemn this cowardly attack in the strongest terms possible and ask that the perpetrators be punished to the full extent of the law. No religious or political ideology could ever justify or excuse such wanton and indiscriminate violence. The attack was particularly heinous in that it targeted the all-volunteer army that protects our nation. American Muslims stand with our fellow citizens in offering both prayers for the victims and sincere condolences to the families of those killed or injured.”

Along with innumerable condemnations of terror, CAIR has in the past launched an online anti-terror petition drive called “Not in the Name of Islam,” initiated a television public service announcement (PSA) campaign against religious extremism and coordinated a “fatwa,” or Islamic religious ruling, against terrorism and extremism.

SEE: CAIR’s Anti-Terrorism Campaigns

CAIR is America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization. Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding

Saturday, November 14, 2009

On eve of food security summit, Ban to fast in solidarity with world’s hungry

On eve of food security summit, Ban to fast in solidarity with world’s hungry

Posted using ShareThis

Lifting of Oil Price Cap by GMA is a display of mediocrity


The lifting of oil price cap order by GMA is quite disappointing. It was the only Executive Order she made that truly benefit the whole constituents. It was a about to deliver justice—equal treatment of rich and poor. But GMA's toughness is limited only for activists and journalists protesting her performance.

The threat of the oil price cap, I am speaking in managerial perspective, was about to be opportunities. And because of the lifting, we lost those opportunities.

The oil industry was about to have the opportunity to improve its managerial skills and developing the whole human capital to entrepreneurship for better productivity and exploit the technology for efficient and effective to meet its goals.

GMA is poor in leadership to convince the oil firms that they will also benefit in a lot of ways by sacrificing a little financial gain and a mediocre at all.

One good example is recognized by Shell which announced that it is planning to stop its refinery operation due to its high cost based in Mean of Platts Singapore (MOPS) and would rather import refined products. If Shell to decide to continue the refinery ops, it will require for more capital for modernization.

If the cap order is not lift, Shell would probably modernize its refinery resulting (not to mention the capital infusion from its global headquarters) to technology advancement and human capital skills advancement. With the lift order. This dream turned out to be a nightmare—no aggressive process development and skyrocketing price of oil.

One possible scenario if the cap is not lift, Shell will abandon it refinery and import refined products (application of Adam Smith's doctrine but practitioners and disciples of Smith forgot or ignore that the principle of “it is better to buy than to produce if the cost is less to do the former” is aimed to dischargecorporate social responsibility and fiduciary obligations to stakeholders not just for profit alone).


But this threat is again an opportunity for the government to give the market a fair competition in oil industry. Government should take over the would-be abandoned refinery companies to save the workers from losing jobs.

Politically, I would like to congratulate the oil firms. Oil firms won the battle in political arena even without lifting a finger. They just simply hire Energy Secretary Angelo Reyes to be their Spokesman and employ psychological-warfare. I admire the oil firms unity. Organizational effectiveness is becoming obvious. This strength is what the peoples' organization and marginalized sector lack. Some are very limited to street parliamentary (and worse rhetorics).

The Congress should not sit back as if nothing happened. The people-oriented legislative agenda must continue and be given priority over politics.




RANNIE C. AGUSTIN
+639177591043
raniagustin@yahoo.com
www.raniagustin.blogspot.com


Friday, November 13, 2009

AFGHAN WAR and PHILIPPINES WARS



Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, speaking to reporters in the Philippines, zeroed in on that Thursday.
"We're looking to President Karzai, as he forms a new government, to take action that will demonstrate — not to the international community, but first and foremost to his own people — that his second term will respond to the needs that are so manifest," Clinton said. "And I think that the corruption issue really goes to the heart of whether the people ofAfghanistan feel that the government is on their side, is working for them."
Central to any counterinsurgency fight is the struggle over the legitimacy of the government. One explanation for the resurgence of the Taliban over the past three years concerns the failings of the Afghan government, which the Taliban have managed to exploit by offering what many Afghans see as a viable alternative. That is why Obama has taken pains to push for greater nonmilitary support for the mission — additional State Department personnel and more focus on developing Afghan agriculture and trade.


(For full story)



I really appreciate US State Secretary Hillary Clinton on her analysis of the Afghan political crisis. I hope that she could arrive also on the same conclusion with the Philippines perspective.
US indirectly involved itself in war in Mindanao ( against MILF, Abu Sayyaf,) and other armed insurgent nationwide  through Visiting Forces Agreement.
Wars in the Philippines nowadays could be point to government legitimacy and failures to deliver justice among its constituents. Insurgents also managed to exploit the injustices of Filipinos (muslims and non-muslims) to offer alternative that made the rebels belligerents. The worse scenario is that   some Muslim freedom lovers used to misinterpret the Quran and believed that to annihilate the oppressors and non conformists to their belief. Jihadism is used by leaders (spiritual and military) who are frustrated by government outcomes for Islamic interests with balance to non-muslim. But it is a Jihadism polluted with hatred and personal belief and no longer Quranic because they do not spare anyone including fellow Muslims.
President Obama recognized that and it makes him reluctant to and it is painstaking to push for more aggressive military offensives.
The Philippine government should have the same thinking of the two US leaders. Philippines is not worse as Afghanistan. Belligerents are still willing to continue the Peace talk. Sincerity and heart to take care the rebels concern is the way to peace. Government agencies are elders and its President is the father/mother of a society as in one family. The rebels are also children  and members of the family that should be taken into consideration and deserve the best things the parents could afford to give.
 
RANNIE C. AGUSTIN
+639177591043
raniagustin@yahoo.com
www.raniagustin.blogspot.com

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Providing for the poor


Providing for the poor

ROMEO Y. LIM

‘Recovery does not happen equally down the line.’
 
WITH the 2010 elections coming in and candidates mouthing promises that may or may not be kept, perhaps it would be best to know what strategies and programs for the poor will ensure that they are getting what is due them. Conversely, such information would be vital in ensuring that the intended beneficiaries are the ones who benefit and not the "pseudo-indigent. "
For instance, a World Bank (WB) report states that as much as 41% of the subsidized rice being distributed by the National Food Authority (NFA) "goes to non-poor households." It was estimated that the poorest 20% of all households consume just 31% of all NFA rice, while 16% actually go to the top 40% of households in income. This indicates that almost P25 billion in rice subsidies are not reaching the poor, their intended beneficiaries.
Another particular area of concern is socialized housing for the poor. Access to quality housing is a very high priority, and consumes a substantial portion of incomes, especially among the poor and the middle classes. Thus, it has become one of the key areas where public subsidies are being provided.
But the effectivity of some of our public or subsidized low-cost housing projects is highly questionable, with amenities such as airconditioning units becoming frequent signs that we are giving it to the wrong beneficiaries.
There are also other targeting glitches in other basic social services meant for the poor, such as in health and public education. These represent a big waste in public funds allocated for the poor. The national government has had to allocate an additional P67.6 billion just to help poor Filipinos get by with the impact of increased food and fuel prices in 2008 alone.
In time, most households will eventually recover from the effects of the prevailing globalfinancial meltdown. That applies to even the poorest of the poor. The experts’ consensus is we will start to experience a global economic recovery by the last quarter of this year. Signs are pointing to that direction but it could still stand some improvement.
The problem, however, is that recovery does not happen equally down the line. It is the poor who suffer the most in times of crises, and they are also the ones who are slowest to recover. Often times, they lose not just their meager possessions, but also their means of subsistence, such as small farmlands, draft animals, and work implements. Every economic crisis drives them deeper into poverty and worsens the gap between the poor and the rich.
The percentage of Filipinos considered poor was already on the rise even when our economic performance was the best in the region. Now that we are in the midst of a global economic crisis, their numbers are expected to further increase.
We have to rethink not just the way we are helping the poor get by, but also how to better ensure that the funds allocated to improve their lives reach the intended beneficiaries.

Monday, November 2, 2009

A Third Force is in the works




Like what I told my friend and comrade Carlos, any one who wants to take on the presidency needs what I call a dramatis causa---a shocking event that would take everyone by surprise. Delicious surprise, I must say.

Chiz Escudero has now freed himself from the shackles of Danding Cojuangco--and for better reason. He has just announced his resignation from the Nationalist People's Coalition (NPC), the traditional political party that has cuddled him for eleven years. Why?

Escudero has his reasons, and legitimate ones, I must say.

First, how would one fight graft and corruption if financiers with spotty political records are behind your campaign? He was referring to Mr. Cojuangco, who is bedeviled by numerous unresolved graft cases. Second, how would you fight those who cause the further poverty of this nation if they are the ones who dictate your every political move?

Definitely, Escudero did the right thing---he is offering himself to the Filipino People. He is now, a free man. He can now decide whether to run or not for the highest post. Should he decide though, he will definitely either run as vice president or gun for the highest post.

What would now prevent him from running as president and Senator Antonio Trillianes as his running mate? No problem. Reformist groups are very strong at this point. In fact, every organizer can be tapped to help Escudero clinch the highest post of the land. 

What I can now say, as Secretary General of the Young Organizers' Union (YOU), the successor of the YOU (Young Officers' Union), we respect and salute the decision of Senator Francis Escudero. Should he decide to run as president, we, and the Filipino People, will be behind him. 

He can be adopted by the Democratic Party of the Philippines (DPP), a national political party. Or, we can now unite behind Escudero and form a THIRD FORCE. That THIRD FORCE will definitely defeat all these traditional political parties, like the Liberal Party, UNO, and Nacionalista.

A Third Force would surely be a welcome development in the shifting political environment. 

Let me articulate what millions want---a People's Progressive Party (3P), an organization composed of all organizers in every political party uniting behind Escudero. Or a Democratic Party of the Philippines. 

To Senator Escudero----don't worry about your logistics. The Spirit of Bayanihan will provide you with what you need. If we can muster billions for disaster relief, we, the Filipino People, will be behind you and give you billions more just to rehabilitate our damaged institutions.

Truly, may Bagong Umagang Parating!

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 at Wednesday, October 28, 2009 and is filed under  . You can follow any responses to this entry through thecomments feed .

20th National Tuna Congress Broke Records!

Ms. Rosana Contreras, Executive Director of Socsksargen Fishing and Allied Industries Incorporated (SFFAII), Friday, said that the 20 th N...