Message Board


web stats

Thursday, December 30, 2010

P60-B cost of jury system vs P160-B savings from corruption

P60-B cost of jury system vs P160-B savings from corruption
Running jury system costs Phils P60-billion but 
saves P160 billion from corruption reduction


Privilege Spits (January 3 to January 9, 2011 issue of Dyaryo Magdalo)



By TOTO CAUSING


In my burning desire to change the country’s present fiscal-judge system of justice, I am now taking the liberty of analyzing the cost of maintaining a jury system similar to that of the United States of America (USA), know how it can reduce corruption that runs now in the Philippines at 20% of the national budget, and know how much can the country save from the thieves in the government.


I was prompted to go to this dissertation by a Facebook friend who insisted that the Philippines can never ever afford to have a jury system because it is very expensive.


I agreed that it was very expensive. However, I begged to disagree that being expensive does not mean it is not economical.


The result of my dissertation, as will be read hereunder, shows that the cost of running a jury system in the entire country reaches only to Php 60 billion and the additional jury education program entails only Php 20 billion.


The total cost of Php 80 billion is far lesser than the Php 160-billion savings that can be gotten from the reduction of corruption due to the jury system’s nature of being a far better rigid justice system that is too difficult to be manipulated by the racketeers, the thieves in the government, and the lords.


Thus, the cost: Php 80 billion.  The savings: Php 160 billion. 

My premises:

So, here is my dissertation on this matter of economics of the jury system.

Let me begin by saying that if the amount required to run the jury systems is "very expensive" as you describe, it does not automatically mean it is not economical.

Amongst us who are civil engineers, we may choose one option that demands triple expense when the lifespan is at least triple more than any of the other choices.

A better economic strategy I know chooses from what options that stimulate the more number of transactions in a given period of time;  what ensure bigger returns from these transactions  in terms of taxes paid to the government and in terms of incomes going to participants in the transactions;   what attract more number of people participating in transactions in a given community;  and what make the number and magnitude of transactions going and growing.

Eventually, good economic decisions must be founded on what result in most number of transactions with biggest number of taxes along with bigger number of persons involved.  The more transactions, the more taxes to the government, the more and better services are given by the government to its people, and the more people are exchanging goods and services and monies, and the more people are employed or earning income.

One community for instance has a total of 100 million pesos if we sum up all monies in each person and in each entity (business unit such as a corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship).  

Assume that the government in this place is capitalism and not socialism that has more regulations about how the funds shall be controlled, or not communism that ensures each individual therein is as rich or as poor as each other. 

Assume further that this capitalist place cannot compel individuals to spend because it believes in free market and as such it relies only on the willingness of each of the people to spend or invest as they wish.  

Now, we know that transactions cannot happen without buyers or without those that are obliged to pay by reason of deals.  
 With these givens, if we want progress for all we prefer a system of government that brings about more people buying services and goods in a year so that:  (1) more taxes (sales, evat, and income) are collected in one tax year;  (2) more businesses have better chance to continue to live and grow consequently resulting in generation of more employment;  (3) more chances that people are employed to make them acquire wealth in the form of incomes as fruits of their labor in order to empower them as having more buying capacity to, in turn, acquire goods, services, better education, etc;  (4) more people becoming more creative in thinking what to do to make decent profits; and  (5) more people continue behaving in the way what the laws want them to conduct in relation to each other and in relation to their government.

Assuming this government has achieved these desirable economic activities to happen, can this ideal economy continue without strict justice system that compels people to behave by the laws?    I strongly believe it will not stay as ideal with a loose justice system that chooses to vow to those who are the wealthy and the influential. 

Despite all these sought-after objectives to give real progress for all people, there are always things that go out of hand.   This is because there all always people who  “greed” for money or sex, “desire to seek glory” either in wealth or politics, err in the performance of duties and the exercise of rights, or commit improprieties simply because of intoxications like liquor that loosen the hold of morality over intoxicated persons, or fall on accidents and or else can we think of.  

Co-existing with these negative matters that any society, rich or poor, cannot avoid, is the NATURAL DESIRE to avoid punishments.  

And this natural motive among persons to evade liability breeds and grows a culture of corruption if only to escape the harshness of hell behind bars, if only to preserve reputation, or if only to escape paying out for liabilities incurred.

So that if the justice system can be bought or influenced, the situation in this place will deteriorate over time, sooner or later, into the culture of impunity bad as what Maguindanao has reached.

Thus, I argue: even if we begin to create a country with all citizens having One Million Pesos in their respective pockets but with loose justice system such as what we have for 110 years, we will still end up as one of the poorest and most chaotic countries in the world.

Before continuing, let one more truth be spoken: crimes are offenses against the state so that it should be the state’s obligation to ensure justice is served where it is due.


Where lies our country:

Now, take a scenario of the Philippines where, approximately, 10% of the people are  holding 80% of the total country’s monetary wealth while 90% are fighting for shares of the remaining 20% of all monies.

Look at our country.  

Our country is where the justice system for over a hundred years is composed of fiscals deciding as to who should be charged in court and the court with one judge.   It has been modified over time that the Ombudsman now has the sole power to bring to court corruption cases and the Commission on Elections having exclusive power to bring to court election crime offenders.

Thus, you see MalacaƱang man Joc-joc Bolante not getting charged in court by the Ombudsman; or former Comelec commissioner Virgilio Garciliano not charged in court by the Comelec for vote rigging. 

Our country is where over time we have seen decisions of trial courts overturned by higher courts and where higher courts give out decisions that amused the people.   

Our country is where we often hear songs crying out for justice from inside our prison walls, as echoed by Freddie Aguilar’s “Katarungan.”

Our country is where one can hear countless of songs of freedom for these songs are born only where  liberty is restrained and where injustices are aplenty.

Our country is where judgments are more based on opinions than evidence as proven by Hubert Webb case where they were convicted upon the opinion of the trial court only to be acquitted 15 years later by another opinion of the court, this time the Supreme Court's opinion.

Our country is where we have seen more and more economically-lower-classedcitizens becoming more and more mistrusting in the justice system because their common experience point to the poor rarely getting the better end of justice.

Our country is where the poor and have-nots prefer to suffer the pain of injustice in silence than to fight lords who not only buy fiscals and judges but also kill more if only to ensure freedom to kill, to steal, to cheat in political contests, and to do what else.

Our country is where the poor absolutely have no fair chance at courts of law.

Name what you want and we are on the nadir of all the ebbs, of all the law tides.


Taking a deeper look at justice economics:

Thus, the question now is: JUST BECAUSE IT APPEARS THAT JURY SYSTEM IS EXPENSIVE, DO WE HAVE TO DISCARD IT BECAUSE OF THE GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES WE HAVE AS STATED ABOVE?

On what scale should we measure to choose a justice system to use given the circumstances the Filipinos are in?  

Shall we have a “cheap” court with one judge and one fiscal deciding almost everything, for or against the accused, depending on the availability of funds, just because of the circumstances the Filipinos are in? 

Shall we continue with this “cheap” fiscal-judge justice system where the supposed “learned” (pronounced as “learn-ed”) in law have, as is normal nowadays, been taking advantage of the citizens’ ignorance of the law, just because of the circumstances the Filipinos are in?

Shall we keep the “cheap” status quo even though we have heard so many people complaining of injustice and inability to obtain fair game in law, just because of the circumstances the Filipinos are in?

Shall we prefer to resign to this “cheap” status quo just because of the circumstances the Filipinos are in?

Shall we continue to argue that “it is not in the system but the people in the system” even though we know that it is actually more of the system because we cannot avoid the people who are prone to fall to dishonesty, greed and worldly desires, just because of the circumstances the Filipinos are in?

This is my appeal: Please look deeper as to what can this big expense give us in return.

Haven’t we thought that by using the jury system we are employing more people and that this will remedy the yearly problem of millions of college graduates from every private and state colleges and universities found now in every province and that problem is how to find jobs?  And in so doing, more people are empowered to buy to add taxes to the government and income to others to generate more employment.

Haven’t we thought that by using the jury system it is doubly stricter and doubly rigid against influence and money such that more and more people would think they cannot fool the jury (grand and trial juries) so they tend to think it is better to behave well and refrain from fooling, stealing, and harming others?

Haven’t we thought that with strict and rigid justice system the number and magnitude of corruption incidents may likely reduce by as much as 90%? 

Can we not blame extremely-high corruption incidences and magnitudes in the Philippines on the lax justice system for a century and a decade?  

The cost of corruption:

Look at these reports about our dear country as posted athttp://www.11.be/11/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=103158&Itemid=112:  

“The Philippines has been ranked as among the world's most corrupt by, among others, the Berlin-based non-governmental organization Transparency International. Corruption has become so widespread here that that scandals coming out one after the other dominate the news. Worse, many of these scandals are linked to MalacaƱang Palace and the first family. President Gloria Arroyo was perceived as the most corrupt in Philippine history in a survey done by Pulse Asia in 2007. 

“Corruption has diverted away whatever meager resources that could have been extremely helpful to alleviate the lives of poor Filipinos. The Presidential Anti-Graft Commission (PAGC), a government body tasked to investigate and hear administrative cases and complaints against erring presidential appointees, has revealed that in the Philippines, an average of 20 percent of the country's annual budget goes to corruption. 

“In 2008, the national budget was PhP 1.227 trillion (USD 26 billion). The budget for 2009 is pegged at an all-time high of PhP 1.415 trillion (USD 30 billion) as the government wants to boost spending to shield the economy from a global slump. A provision in the bill requiring reporting transparency was recently taken out by the government despite congressional and media protests. 

“PAGC chairperson Teresita Baltazar says the money lost to corruption "could have been a lot to fund spending for social services like education, healthcare, housing and livelihood capital, and infrastructure."

Looking at the average 20% of the national budget, it means that based on the 2011 national budget of Php1.6 trillion the cost of corruption necessarily goes around Php 320 billion.

The projected savings from corruption through jury system:

So that if the implementation of the jury system reduces corruption by only 50%, does it mean a savings of Php 160 billion?

Based on the nature that it is a far more rigid system of justice, the jury system will cause a reduction of corruption incidences by at least half the present number in the Philippines where the latest national budget approved by President PNoy is at Php 1.6 trillion.

This is guaranteed and supported by the experience of countries with jury systems.  There in the US, corruption is an exception; decency in government service is the rule.  

In the US alone, you can see plenty of state and federal senators and congressmen getting charged and convicted by the grand jury and trial jury.  You saw then President Richard Nixon compelled to resign because of the grand jury investigation.  You saw then President Bill Clinton vowing to get investigated for oral sex scandal in the Oval Office by the grand jury and getting impeached in the US Congress.

In the Philippines, jail time comes to a senator only when he rebels as in Senator Gringo Honasan and Senator Antonio Trillanes IV; like Senator Panfilo Lacson had been charged only because he was ganged up by the then incumbent administration's men but he is wise enough to seek cover.

In the Philippines, you see ex-President Joseph Estrada getting charged and jailed just because the President's men ganged up on him.

In the Philippines, the whole of the Ampatuan lords in Maguindanao were charged all because Gloria Macapagal Arroyo was compelled by the world outrage over the killing of 58 persons including 33 journalists.  But if she chose to ignore these outpouring of outrage, nothing would happen.  Even now that the Ampatuans are held, only one of them is facing trial yet while the rest have succeeded in forestalling the reading of the charges: what with Php 2 billion a year looted from the coffers of the Province of Maguindanao as reflected in the very recent report of the Commission on Audit. Under the Philippine jurisdiction, one cannot be convicted if he has not yet been read of the charges in court. 

Thus, in the Philippines, it all depends if the President desires to help you in order to have a good fight at the prosecution offices or the courts.  And if the President does not know you, say "Goodbye, justice." 


The projected expense of running jury systems:

Now, imagine how much is needed to run a jury system in a province.  Assume that in each province we have one grand jury consisting of 23 jurors and 2 alternates. 

If each is paid Php 1,000 a day, they get Php 20,000 a month.  Multiply this by 25, we spend Php 500,000 a month in salaries.  Add to this Php100,000 more a month for the maintenance of the staff and offices so we spend Php 600,000 a month.  Multiply this by 13 months in one year  (13th month pay law), we need to spend Php 7.3 million in one year for each province or urbanized city for the maintenance of the grand jury, the body whose members hidden from the public shall decide who should be tried in court or not.  By the way, grand jurors' name and faces are hidden to ensure they are independent and not afraid of deciding who to bring to court or not.

NOW, consider trial juries in all six branches of RTCs and about six MTCs, assuming that all courts will have 600 cases to be tried each year by a jury of 12 ordinary Filipinos and 2 alternates.   As the long and rich experiences in other countries show that jury trials last in one to two weeks in the average, assume P30,000 cost for each juror to answer for hotel and security escorts.  Multiplying, we get 30 x 14 = P420,000.00 for each trial.  Multiply this by 600 cases we get: Php420,000 x 600 = P252 million a year.  

With these budgetary estimates, in one province we need to spend Php 7.3 milion + P252 million = Php 259.2 million.

In Maguindanao alone, one of the poorest provinces in the country, the Commission on Audit found that the Ampatuans stole Php 2 billion or Php 2,000 million a year.  This means that even the poorest province can finance the cost of running a jury system unit.

Let us look at a larger scale.

We have 79 provinces. Add 33 highly-urbanized cities to be considered having own separate jury system and we get a total number of 112 jury system units.  

To know how much would be spent for one year in the entire country, we compute: 112 jury system units x 259.2 million expense for each unit = Php 29.0304 billion in cost.  

Now add to this 20% buffer fund to answer for unexpected costs and yearly infrastructure constructions. We get around Php 35 billion in total cost to be spent for the jury system.

Compare this cost to the savings that will be earned from reduction of corruption: Php 160 billion in savings from corruption vs Php 35 billion in cost of running the whole jury systems.

Now, to ensure better understanding of the system among all tribes, use Php 20 billion each year in jury education projects for every province.  Yet we have too plenty of money to spare.

Now, consider also the fact that in civil cases, it is the losing party that will pay for the jury costs.   

Do we see a trend of civil suits reducing sharply just because those who know they have no defenses or evidence to prove their claims are afraid to shoulder the cost of the jury?  

Yes, it will because the civil case litigants will tend to save the most and they can do so by resorting to compromise agreements or settlements to reduce the dockets of the courts instead of opting for a jury trial.

Looking at these hard facts, can we now turn a blind eye to jury systems for Filipinos?

Consider these, my friends.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Squabbling in ZAMCELCO Management

Straight from the Heart
By: Abs Damahan
Squabbling in ZAMCELCO Management
Past few days Zamcelco management and City government officials squabbling over the results of the NEA audit controversy report submitted to the City Mayor’s Office. Former City Councillor Kim Elago demanding the resignation of all top management of the electric cooperative and including the composition of the Board of Directors on their present mandate.
GM Reinerio Ramos responded to the call of their resignation “only NEA governing council has the authority to resolve over the heated Zamcelco controversy”. Top management of the said cooperative even reached Bishop Rumulo Valles calls for possible dialogue with the opposing consumers’ public and group. Councillor Mel Sadain even proposed in his resolution call for general assembly together the same call of Mayor Celso Lobregat.
The hounding controversy and irregularities remains talks of the town pouring of many questions by pundits like me complaining for inefficient and ineffective services of the electric cooperative. With the over-price of purchases of various acquired equipment for Zamcelco and the purchases of luxury cars KIA vehicles. The extravagant unnecessary expenditures, catering, Love fund drive, travels, questionable procurements and displayed fireworks expenses during the Zamcelco’s founding anniversary. I think  “true facts cannot be substituted by false and fabricated hanging answers”. The truths always prevail over and above falsehood.
With evidences figures listed above the complainant like Atty. Kim Elago and group can now files an appropriate charges to erring Zamcelco officials who may be involved in the alleged anomalies and squabbling of funds of the cooperative, so that member consumers will not suffer from the artificial power crisis done through an organized and collaborative scam.
Frequent interrupted brown-out and artificial power shortages caused purely by mismanagement in handling the financial account of the cooperative. Unless the top management of the cooperative institute reform every consumers’ public will suffer affecting households, businesses, commercial establishments and all other industries base in Zamboanga City.
Send comments and reactions to abs_damahan@yahoo.com or call 926-9418, CP 09283147761 and Blog: http://absdamahan.wordpress.com

Friday, October 15, 2010

Aquino Grants Amnesty to Trillanes and other Soldiers

Posted: 11 Oct 2010 07:26 PM PDT


President Aquino grants amnesty to Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV and all the other soldiers charged for standing up to Gloria Arroyo.
Concurrence of both houses of Congress is expected to follow in the coming days. Some 160 members of the House of Representatives and 17 senators have earlier signed separate resolutions urging the President to grant amnesty to the rebel soldiers. They are expected to concur with the proclamation.
The proclamation also approves the re-integration of the service of enlisted men. Officers are not covered by the re-integration.
Proclamation No. 50:

MALACAƑAN PALACE
MANILA
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES
PROCLAMATION NO. 50
GRANTING AMNESTY TO ACTIVE AND FORMER PERSONNEL OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE PHILIPPINES AND THEIR SUPPORTERS WHO MAY HAVE COMMITTED ACTS OR OMISSIONS PUNISHABLE UNDER THE REVISED PENAL CODE, THE ARTICLES OF WAR OR OTHER SPECIAL LAWS COMMITTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE OAKWOOD MUTINY, THE MARINES STAND-OFF AND THE MANILA PEN INCIDENT AND RELATED INCIDENTS
WHEREAS, it is recognized that certain active and former personnel of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and their supporters have or may have committed acts or omissions which may be punishable under the Revised Penal Code, the Articles of War and other laws in connection with July 27, 2003 Oakwood Mutiny, the February 2006 Marines Stand-Off and the November 29, 2007 Manila Pen Incident and related incidents;
WHEREAS, there is a clamor from certain sectors of society urging the President to extend amnesty to said AFP personnel;
WHEREAS, Section 19, Article VII of the Constitution expressly vests the power to grant amnesty upon the President;
WHEREAS, in order to promote an atmosphere conducive to the attainment of a just, comprehensive and enduring peace and in line with the Government’s peace and reconciliation initiatives, there is a need to declare amnesty in favor of the said active and former personnel of the AFP and their supporters;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BENIGNO S. AQUINO III, President of the Philippines, by virtue of the powers vested in me by Section 19, Article VII of the Philippine Constitution, do hereby DECLARE and PROCLAIM:
SECTION 1. Grant of Amnesty. – Amnesty is hereby granted to all active and former personnel of the AFP as well as their supporters who shall apply therefor and who have or may have committed acts or omissions punishable under the Revised Penal Code, the Articles of War or other special laws in connection with, in relation or incident to the July 27, 2003 Oakwood Mutiny, the February 2006 Marines Stand-Off and/or the November 29, 2007 Manila Pen Incident and related incidents; Provided that amnesty shall not cover crimes against chastity and other crimes committed for personal ends.
SECTION 2. Where to Apply. – The concerned AFP personnel and their supporters may apply for amnesty under this Proclamation with the Department of National Defense (DND). The DND is hereby tasked with the functions and duties of receiving and processing applications for amnesty under this proclamation and determining whether the applicants are covered by amnesty under this Proclamation. The final decisions or determination of the DND shall be appealable to the Office of the President.
SECTION 3. Period of Application. – Applications for the grant of amnesty under this Proclamation shall be filed under oath with the DND within a period of ninety (90) days following the date of the publication of this Proclamation in two (2) newspapers of general circulation. The DND shall forthwith act on the same with dispatch.
SECTION 4. Effects. –
(a) Amnesty under this proclamation shall extinguish any criminal liability for acts committed in relation to, in connection with or incident to the July 27, 2003 Oakwood Mutiny, the February 2006 Marines Stand-Off and the November 29, 2007 Manila Pen Incident without prejudice to the grantee’s civil liability for injuries or damages caused to private persons.
(b) The grant of amnesty shall also effect the restoration of civil and political rights or entitlement that may have been suspended, lost or adversely affected by virtue of ant executive action and/or administrative criminal action or proceedings lodged against the grantee in connection with the subject incidents, including criminal conviction or any form, if any.
(c) All enlisted personnel of the Armed Forces of the Philippines whose applications for amnesty would be approved shall be entitled to reintegration or reinstatement, subject to existing laws and regulations. Officers of the AFP on the other hand shall not be entitled to reintegration or reinstatement into the service.
(d) The amnesty shall reinstate the right of AFP personnel to retirement and separation benefits, if so qualified under existing laws and regulations at the same time of the commission of the acts for which the amnesty is extended.
SECTION 5. Effectivity. – This Proclamation shall take effect immediately upon the signing thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the Republic of the Philippines to be affixed.
DONE in the City of Manila, 11th day of October in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Ten.
(Sgd.) BENIGNO S. AQUINO III
By the President:
(Sgd.) PAQUITO N. OCHOA, JR.
Executive Secretary

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Straight from the Heart

Abs Damahan
The elected Executive Officers of Golden Crescent Peace Center
Group of professionals who are advocating for peace are formally elected into office last Saturday, August 7, 2010 at around 3:00PM at the Peace Advocates Office, SLSI Building, San Jose Street, Zamboanga City.
The elected founding and Executive Officers will hold office from 2010 to 2012 are the followings: Chairman- Professor Ali T. Yacub, Al-Hj., Vice Chairman (Internal)- Prof. Eddie M. Ladja, Vice Chairman (external)- Hja. Rahma Sakaluran-Mohammad, Secretary General- Habib Alkhaulan Hashim, Asst. Sec. Gen- Mr. Aldrin Abdurahim, Treasurer Dr. Lea U. Laput, and Auditor- Engr. Yashier Ibba.
Straight from the heart Columnist- Abduljaman ‘Abs’ A. Damahan elected Director for Public Relation and Media Affairs and the rest officers will be elected in the next session after the month of Ramadan and will be published the same in my column.
Golden Crescent Peace Center member of consortium civil society in the sector of an Interreligious Solidarity Movement for Peace contributing more on research and development (R & D) focus on peace builders for Mindanao area, as well supporting the national government agenda of PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT.
This new professional’s organized group can be partners and tapped by the National Government and new Commission for technical works and writings of their various programs- The National Commission on Muslim Filipinos (NCMF) in some selected departments namely: 1. Muslim Economic Affairs, 2. Muslim Cultural Affairs, 3. Muslim Settlement, and 4. Peace and Conflict Resolution.
Compromising the peace with a serious intent, I don’t think so, we cannot succeed in the quest for Mindanaoan to achieve the genuine and lasting peace of all the regions of Mindanao affected in the long overdue internal conflicts- The Moro conflicts.
The perceptions of Mindanaoan on the stalled peace process- The reasons behind the failures are the insincerity of both parties GRP and Moro resistance group.
We are committed to supports in all legal and acceptable parameters on the on-going peaceful agreements between the government and the Moro resistance group.
For comments, reactions and suggestions please e-mail at abs_damahan@yahoo.com or call to tel No. 062-926-9418 or text Cell. No. 09283147761 Blog: http://absdamahan.wordpress.com



Saturday, August 7, 2010

Straight from the Heart

Abs Damahan
Zamboanga International Airport Blast
Zamboanga City experienced horrible trauma when bomb exploded at 6:20 PM Thursday, August 5, 2010, at the passenger arrival area of Zamboanga International Airport two confirm dead and more than 20 wounded including Jolo Sulu Governor Abdulsakur Tan are now confined in different hospitals of the city. The SOCO Team found two IDs: 1. SSS ID Card and Zamcelco ID with the bearing name Reynaldo Apilado resided at Bragy. Maasin, Zamboanga City. According to the investigators team fixed ID picture in the ID card is matched to the de-capacitated body found in the ground of bombing site which the alleged one of the suspect to this kind of horrendous dastardly and cowardly act to victimized the innocence civilians of Zamboanga City and adjacent provinces of Western Mindanao.
In the latest update Sulu Governor Tan insisted the bomb is intended for his life and this is for second attempt, first was at Provincial Capitol of Jolo on May 2009 in a planted Motorcycle Bomb. Governor said, he is lucky enough to escape from an instant death which the Governor is only one meter away from the impact of the blast.
If this bomb is intended for the Governor what benefits are we going to achieve? From the point of view, we gain nothing; this is unacceptable cowardly act of political cultures of violence and dead-wrong activities of dastardly kind of politics. Re-thinks the dark behind the motives,this is a condemnable acts a negative impact for the whole interest of Mindanaoan. I think for those who are not delighted to be enlightened ,this is start of a wake-up calls for all Mindanaoan to protect our leaders if still has the same motive to eliminate our elected leaders from power. stop the atrocities in our homeland preserve the value and dignity that we inherited from our fore-fathers.
For the benefits who follow this column, I was touched when I attended the lectures conducted by the Philippines Council for Islam and Democracy (PCID) at the Western Mindanao State University (WMSU) College of Law Auditorium yesterday August 2, 1010. The presentor is no less than Ms. Amina Rasul. In her clippings presentation.  ‘The factors that led to decline the resources of the Moro Provinces during Martial Law’, and to include present practices of the National policy planners, triggered Causes: 1. Destruction of Infrastructures, 2. Capital flights, and 3. Brain drain.
In simple analysis this is a true fact why ARMM provinces are so poor Local Government Units (LGUs).  While Mindanao is one economic hub of our republic, as a whole is number 5 in GDP, but in the actual data funds releases actually a big pie are focus to CARAGA provinces and cities and include Zamboanga City for Mindanao.  For the ARMM provinces and cities is with a limited shares of funds. So therefore, ‘there would be an imbalance of an economic discrepancy of our democracy in one republic for the minority rights’.
For comments, reactions and suggestions please e-mail at abs_damahan@yahoo.com or call to tel No. 062-926-9418 or text Cell. No. 09283147761 Blog: http://absdamahan.wordpress.com

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Straight from the Heart

Abs Damahan
Controversial Bill proposal of Congresswoman GMA and son Congressman Dado Arroyo for the expansion of ARMM coverage area.
I am now the subject of controversy when recently posted to my facebook account quote ‘Rep-GMA and Rep Dato Arroyo I was one hardcore opposition to your administration, now, ‘I will declare to support your Bills on this very laudable proposal to expand more ARMM provinces and Cities. As I even propose to re-write the ARMM Organic Act to resolve genuinely and peacefully the Moro problems. A high notes of this proposal for the 15th new set-up Congress’...
For public discourse I was one staunched hard-hitting opposition to the public policy of former President GMA from the start of her presidency until she exit from power. they way she ran the ship of our republic. It made public in some of my strong worded opinion thread and posted comments in fb account focus of the alleged controversial messed in the Palace. To make known to the public my articles and bloggers remain an independent taught direct from the heart. Whoever individual and group did the right works for the whole an inclusive for all human dignity and general welfare of the people will surely get the honorable praised from this column. And the same token whoever individual and group did mistake or malpractices in his/her leadership and career will surely get a strong words of criticism and condemnation from this column.
In the case of Representative GMA in her proposed bill for the expansion of ARMM coverage area to City of Zamboanga and Saranggani Province I think, this one of very laudable proposal in her representation for the Moro problems of over 40 years internal conflicts. That why, I praised her ‘she is now the part of solution not a part of the problem’. Let us give her chance to defend the proposed bill in the house of congress on her view in the affirmative side and the rest critiquing the bill on the negative side. We are in the process of lively debates and healthy democratic process majority opinions are superb rather over the minority opinion in a free market of idea.
For the past wrong doing of former President in her 9 years inside the Palace, if proven by the ‘Truth Commission’, Legal Court proceeding and Judiciary system of our republic , ‘she should answerable to the mess she has done wrong during her term if any, on the basis of due process of law’.
For comments, reactions and suggestions please e-mail at abs_damahan@yahoo.com or call to tel No. 062-926-9418 or text Cell. No. 09283147761 Blog: http://absdamahan.wordpress.com



Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Straight from the Heart

Abs Damahan
Zamboanga City Water District is inefficient serving consumer public.
Since the El-Nino season up to now rainy season Zamboanga  City Water District still inefficient serving the household imagine for almost a year since the summer season my home has not provided enough water supply. What happen to the management of Zamboanga City Water District? Are they capable to run the operation of water concessioners? Or in the midst of mismanagement crisis like the fate of ZAMCELCO in the past months almost felt the same in a financial melt-down.
From this column I calls upon you we need sufficient power and water supplies reach every household within the perimeter homes and including the residence inside post-subdivision area. Light and water are those parts of basic necessities for human lives needs really to be upgraded and improved the quality of service by ZAMCELCO and Water District Concessioners.
Light and water is really the negative disturbing factors for the daily activities and routines of every-one of us living the urban city without the two basic necessities we are not so comport to deal and transact with friends, acquaintances and our contacts.
Pouring of enough resources to Cooperative and the water concessioners would means improving the quality of service for consumers’ public.  At least Zamboangenos are not hesitant to pay their bills on due date time.
For comments, reactions and suggestions please e-mail at abs_damahan@yahoo.com or call to tel No. 062-926-9418 or text Cell. No. 09283147761 Blog: http://absdamahan.wordpress.com



Saturday, July 31, 2010

Straight from the Heart

Abs Damahan
Dou Philanthropists’ assisted 535 Basilan schoolchildren
Philam Chair Jose Cuisia handed out worth of PhP1.5M pesos checks to PBSP Chair Manuel V. Pangilinan to fund the program of 9th year Aid for Basilan Children or ABC project being implemented by PBSP (Philippine Business for Social Progress) In Basilan Island.
The ABC helps 535 schoolchildren with scholarship assistance, books, and school supplies to prevent them from dropping of school due to poverty and disruption in community life. Aid for Basilan Children Projects assists conflict-affected children in the aftermath of the siege of Lamitan town in 2001.
As I have posted in my facebook account ‘If only not thru education I might be a dreaded commander of the lawless elements of my province-Basilan in the 70s and 80s’. But because of education all my life and family becomes a good citizen of the republic to obey law and order of the state.
I still remember the privilege speech of the late Congressman Wahab M. Akbar in the 14th Congress before he was killed in car-bombed at the ground floor of the Batasan Complex, he said ‘Instead of sending more military troops to my province why not sending more financial aids, more government funds, livelihood assistance and government projects to the LGUs –Basilan’,  which I think, this is likely a correct approach and strategies of the national government to resolve a long decades of an internal conflicts that cannot find a genuine, permanent, lasting and peaceful resolution of over 40 years Mindanao conflicts.
For the good deeds of philanthropists’ works of Chair Cuisa and Chair Pangilinan this should sustain not only in Basilan, but the rest provinces of conflict-affected areas in Mindanao and elsewhere provinces of the Philippines who needed most financial assistance for most valued education of the rural children, who cannot afford for higher education. My good friend Armand Dean Nucom has also the same programs for child in the conflict-affected area books launching intended for young’s-armed resistance.
For comments, reactions and suggestions please e-mail at abs_damahan@yahoo.com or call to tel No. 062-926-9418 or text Cell. No. 09283147761 Blog: http://absdamahan.wordpress.com


20th National Tuna Congress Broke Records!

Ms. Rosana Contreras, Executive Director of Socsksargen Fishing and Allied Industries Incorporated (SFFAII), Friday, said that the 20 th N...